Home Foundation FASB Store Board Meetings Calendar Contact FASB News Center GASB
Recent Additions
Action Alert
Project Activities
FASB Webcast Series
Exposure Documents
Comment Letters
Technical Inquiry
EITF
Effective Dates
FAS 133 Derivatives Implementation
International
Wash. DC Activities
FASB Report Articles
Reports & Presentations
Publications
Pronouncements & EITF Abstracts
FAQs
Facts about FASB
FASAC
Investors Technical Advisory Committee
Investor Task Force
User Advisory Council
Small Business Advisory Committee
Private Company Financial Reporting Committee
Careers
Directions & Area Hotels

Cases on Recognition Measurement

The "See-through" Office Building Case

"What goes down must come back up"

Dauntless Development Company owns what is referred to as a "see-through" office building, as the glass-walled structure is largely unoccupied and most floors are unfinished internally. The building cost Dauntless $10 million to build and was the last building completed during the downtown building boom. It is now 5 years old and has a carrying amount of $9 million.

Although the building is less than 30 percent occupied, management believes there is no reason that its carrying amount will not be recovered over the remainder of the building's expected 50-year life. Current vacancy rates are such that there is a 15-year supply of equivalent vacant space available in the area.

*  *  *  *

Should the building that Dauntless owns be regarded as an "impaired asset" and its carrying amount be written down? If so, to what amount should it be written down?

Search
Advanced Search

Pages in this Section:

About This Site            Copyright Permission            Terms and Conditions